23 Feb
2005
23 Feb
'05
6:39 a.m.
On Tuesday, February 22, 2005, 6:19:06 AM, Robert Brooks wrote:
David B Funk wrote:
I'm seeing a new spam varient that is clearly designed to get past SURBL. It is an HTML message that contains many (50~100) 'invisible' links; links that have no target text, just: <A href="http://garbage.sitename.tld"></A>
Is it time to create rules to penalize large numbers of 'invisible' links?
it would also be good to discard pointless links before querying surbl's, not sure how easy that is going to be to code though
Yes, there is a SpamAssassin bugzilla with a feature request to ignore unclickable URIs:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3976
Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."