On Tuesday, September 21, 2004, 10:32:16 PM, Jeff Chan wrote:
On Tuesday, September 21, 2004, 3:18:43 AM, Jeff Chan wrote:
OK we heard back from Theo that we probably won't be able to get JP into SpamAssassin 3.0, but we should be able to get it into 3.1. I believe the JP data and policies are different enough that it should be a separate list within multi.surbl.org, so I propose that we:
- Add JP to multi.surbl.org now.
- Keep the JP data in WS for now, so that regular 3.0 users
get the advantages of JP also (as part of WS).
- Ask SA to put JP into 3.1 for future use, and most
significantly, separate scoring.
OK We would like to proceed with the first part of this. We propose adding JP to multi on Monday September 27, but keeping the JP data in WS for now, and asking SA to add JP to SA 3.1 after that change next Monday. We would want to announce the new list so that other programs using multi.surbl.org would know that the return values had changed. That would give them some time if they need to make adjustments to their code. JP would get the 64 bitmask, as in:
2 = comes from sc.surbl.org 4 = comes from ws.surbl.org 8 = comes from phishing list (labelled as [ph] in multi) 16 = comes from ob.surbl.org 32 = comes from ab.surbl.org 64 = comes from jp list
Does anyone have comments?
Jeff C.
I'm going to assume a lack of comments means everyone agrees....
Jeff C.