FWIW There is a revised SpamCopURI (SA 2.6x) config at:
Jeff and all:
I'm learning more about submitting SPAM that we get as I know we have quite a honeypot based on the past work from the SpamAssassin guys on our server. Today I got two SPAMs that looked like candidates to submit. One was not listed and I submitted to Mr. Stearns. That went perfectly. However, one URL did not work out as planned and because of my recent issue with a typo in the 2.6 config, I'm a bit panicky just to make sure I really have a handle on how the interaction is working.
Anyway, I have checked this URL, healthyandcozy-MUNGED.com, at http://www.rulesemporium.com/cgi-bin/uribl.cgi?report=1;uri=editdiscussions....;
It is listed in ws, ob, jp and multi which I can also confirm is working on d3.surbl.org:
ping healthyandcozy.com.multi.surbl.org PING healthyandcozy.com.multi.surbl.org (127.0.0.84) from 127.0.0.84 : 56(84) bytes of data.
And I have switched the SpamCop 2.6 config to the updated file above to ensure that a small typo isn't my issue. I have then sent myself an email with just this text in the body sans the munged: healthyandcozy-MUNGED.com
It does not hit.
However, I have found that if I have put www.healthyandcozy-munged.com the URI hit is positive. I have further confirmed that http://healthyandcozy-munged.com/ is a hit as well.
This seems like a loophole to me since it's still possible that an MUA will automatically make just something.com into a link and it's annoying since I'd still like these emails marked as SPAM. Can anyone comment? Am I over worried? Is this by design? Is it fixed in SA 3.0?
Regards, KAM