On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 21:02:26 -0700, Jeff Chan jeffc@surbl.org wrote:
cyberpolice.ru just got added to sc.surbl.org. Does anyone know if they are spammers or not?
Large spamrun has been sent out using this domain. We have plenty of copies on file here.
From - Thu Sep 02 15:39:37 2004
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Return-Path: www@cyberpolice.ru Received: from mx2.mailsecurity.net.au (mx2.mailsecurity.net.au [67.18.110.234]) by corp.mailsecurity.net.au (8.12.11/3.0.0) with ESMTP id i81It2vK027557 for xxx@xxx.xxx.au; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 04:55:10 +1000 Received: from 67.18.110.234 ([61.145.73.222]) by mx2.mailsecurity.net.au (2.52a) with SMTP id i81IrkFI002376 for xxx@xxx.xxx.au; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 04:53:49 +1000 X-Message-Info: HGKVBW2ciaONIbIZry4u281+RKcvq898uozZX Received: from mail468.ziw.comcast.net (252.100.33.96) by xk82-njb704.comcast.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Sun, 01 Sep 2002 13:49:27 -0600 Received: from QU823 (kt251.242.170.48.rvrzi136.yv.comcast.net 207.186.144.163) by mail30.ido.comcast.net (3.35.6i9/63.15.00) with SMTP id eas2NM99Zqfb29; Sun, 01 Sep 2002 12:48:27 -0700 Message-ID: 254xp1g122khh7hy$q02ssm9qo6$bar0i753@IVX2 From: "www@cyberpolice.ru" www@cyberpolice.ru To: "xxx" xxx@xxx.com.au References: marmot965-I762SKomUEsslLUV135X0q06@comcast.net Subject: [Possible Spam] denton Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2002 16:48:27 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/report; boundary="======1979==46726======" X-MS-SpamCheck: This message is likely to be spam, SPAM Database (score=350, required 150, BAYES_60 50.00, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET 50.00, RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK 50.00, RCVD_SPAMHAUS_XBL 100.00, SARE_BOUNDARY_07 50.00, SARE_HEAD_SPAM 50.00) X-MS-From: www@cyberpolice.ru
MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--6546910835501891"
----6546910835501891 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Best forum about mailing and spam Get involved today! http://www.cyberpolice-MUNGED.ru