On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 02:28:16PM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
At 14:16 26/04/2004, Eric Kolve wrote:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 01:11:28PM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
At 05:50 26/04/2004, you wrote:
On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 05:57:56PM +0200, John Fawcett wrote:
One of the things I noticed after upgrading to SpamCopURI 0.14 was that previously I had been identifying all mail containing ads.msn.com as spam and after the upgrade this was no longer happening.
(BTW ads.msn.com was still listed in sc.surbl.org when I observed this behaviour. It has since been removed.)
To take care of this in the short term you can add an entry to your spamcop_uri.cf if you have open redirect resolution on:
open_redirect_list_spamcop_uri g.msn.com ads.msn.co
Is that line correct ? or should it be something like:
open_redirect_list_spamcop_uri g.msn.com *.ads.msn.com
*.ads.msn.com would match the following:
xxx.yyy.ads.msn.com, foo.ads.msn.com, but wouldn't match ads.msn.com.
I suppose you could do *ads.msn.com and match all of the above plus ads.msn.com, but you would also match fads.msn.com.
Good point... I guess I should have just meant the missing m at the end of .com
I totally missed that. I double checked the file that I committed and its correct. Sorry about the confusion.
--eric
This is from the core address list matching that ships with SA.
ads.msn.com will only match ads.msn.com. Putting g.msn.com and ads.msn.com on the same line is no different than putting them on separate lines. I just thought I would try to keep msn stuff on the same line.
Ahhhh.... that clears things up... I thought there was some magic property to the third field that I just hadn't worked out yet :)
Regards, Simon
Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.surbl.org http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss