19 Sep
2004
19 Sep
'04
12:04 a.m.
On Thursday, September 16, 2004, 4:45:46 PM, Bret Miller wrote:
As you can see from the first message about this, the FP rates of PJ look significantly lower than WS as a whole.
I'm for splitting the data out of WS into it's own list and including it in multi. Certainly, having a lower FP rate will encourage users to increase its weight in scoring messages.
Exactly. With a lower FP rate, PJ could be scored higher than WS, and the data could therefore be more effective at stopping spam.
Jeff C.