Jeff Chan wrote:
On Monday, October 4, 2004, 10:37:18 AM, Chris Santerre wrote:
From: Yves Junqueira [mailto:yves.junqueira@gmail.com] On Mon, 4 Oct 2004 07:29:14 -0700, Jeff Chan jeffc@surbl.org wrote:
The policy is: if it has legitimate uses, then don't list.
Can you provide some examples of legitimate sites on kit.net (preferably in English)?
Sorry, I couldn't find any in english.
http://www.tmabc.kit.net - http://www.1mais1.kit.net - They seem good people. They are a group of volunteers that assist home less people. Doesn't seem to be a scam.
I'd suggest whitelisting kit.net if, and only if, you are really strict to the policy. They do host many trojans and scam sites there.
Why not treat them like the tld is 'kit.net' and list on subdomains?
That's an interesting suggestion, but we're not set up to do that currently. We chose to go after registrar domains since they are the ones that set the spam policies for a given domain. If subdomains are spammy, then it's the responsibility of the parent domain to police it.
so what about? cbj.net tripod.cl tripod.*
etc, etc.....
these all host spammers as well as ham'rs Just got a report for amsterdam24. tripod. cl
tripod.cl "could" have legitmate users" but "amsterdam24. tripod. cl/index.txt" is definitely not one.......
so we blacklist them and "it's the responsibility of the parent domain to police it" ???? (done!)
Alex