----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Chan" jeffc@surbl.org To: "SURBL Discuss" discuss@lists.surbl.org Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 1:33 PM Subject: [SURBL-Discuss] RFC: Public false positve reporting form
How does anyone feel about a public false positive reporting form? Such a form would include the reporting party, the domain(s) or IPs, reasons why it's a false positive, etc.
Good idea...
It could be processed publically or privately in a bug tracking system. It would be hand checked by some of our experienced spam fighters. The results could be published or simply aggregated without public announcement into the overall whitelist.
Privately
Is this a good or bad idea?
Good idea
What level of publication should there be?
msg to the "ham reporter" only, no public announcement.
would "spam reporters" have insight into these WL to know if they should BL locally ?
What forms of proof (if any) does anyone like?
up to you......
Other comments?
nope
Alex