-----Original Message----- From: Raymond Dijkxhoorn [mailto:raymond@prolocation.net] Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 10:26 AM To: SURBL Discussion list Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] ws.surbl.org more FP's
Hi!
meredith.com (magazine publisher - owner of americanbaby.com
newsletter)
websponsors.com be3a.com
This week has been a particularly bad week for FP's :(
I dont know about the other 2 but websponsors.com is not a FP. They are a advertising network and have a lot of people spamming to drive traffic to the sites they advertise. Why would you wanna whitelist that one ? Any specific reasons ?
Perhaps look here: http://websponsors.com/affiliates.htm
We have seen a LOT of mail with that one and refers to it.
Its a matter of vieuw i also think, what you feel is a FP, but in this case i dont agree with you.
Hey for once these didn't come from me or my sources :)
However:
websponsors.com be3a.com
Both show up in 6dos data files. Which at least raises an eyebrow.
--Chris