El 28 Jun 2004 a las 17:19, Robert Brooks escribió:
Chris Santerre wrote:
That might hurt a lot of virtually hosted and legit sites.
well, if the scoring is appropriate I don't see it's worse than the way smtp rbl's are handled.
But, for me, SURBL is much better than plain smtp rbls because its collateral damage is very, very, very low... regretfully, I can't play the BOFH and I have to let pass legit e-mail from 'bad' or 'regular' ISPs (most ISPs in Argentina, including the largest ones would be in these categories, and I can't reject e-mail from the largest ISPs in the country).
I'm using relatively high scores for SURBL (between 3.0 and 4.0) and couldn't be doing this with a higher rate of FPs...
See the thread 'Rule for email of "$43321" ?' in SpamAssassin-Users list... SURBL caught most or all of them because it was highly scored...
It might also encourage the webhosting companies to clamp down on spammers hosting content with them.
I'll happily let SPEWS and the other IP RBLs deal with this.
Regards.
-- Mariano Absatz El Baby ---------------------------------------------------------- Don't worry. I forgot your name, too!