On Tuesday, May 4, 2004, 2:03:11 AM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
I think the intention was for our data to be integrated directly into William's prior to arriving at nameservers, however Jeff is more likely to be able to confirm this :)
That would be perfect, saves the trouble of making a seperate list.
Would only be nice for example to give a specific code back, so people see what the hit triggered... But thats possible, we only need to reserve a code in that case.
It's pretty certain we will want to do a combined list of at least ws and sc. As an alternative to Bill merging a phishing list into ws, we could add it to a combined list and *not* have it as a small, separate list. (In other words it would obly be available in a combined list.) If we do the latter we could probably give it a unique result value.
Either way is possible (i.e. merge into ws, or merge into a combined list.):
1. Merge into ws: probably no specific code for phishing 2. Merge into combined list: could have a separate code 2a. (With no separate list for phishing if it's small.)
Jeff C.