I thought we had a discussion on this already? The list I added has been in there for like 2 months. I went thru it. I do NOT use this guys list nilly willy. I haven't updated that file in 2 months. I only took his 100 recent changes, and went thru it and pulled a bunch out that were in question.
So the original file was looked thru by me and never changed. And only 80 or so were added out of the 100 latest updated. I probably won't look at this again for another 2 months as it takes a while to go thru them.
I don't add anything blindly. I don't want FPs either.
Why, is greatnow.com being listed a problem?
"Talk to me Goose!"
--Chris
-----Original Message----- From: Jeff Chan [mailto:jeffc@surbl.org] Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 1:39 PM To: Chris Santerre Cc: 'SURBL Discussion list' Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] free host: greatnow.com
On Friday, October 22, 2004, 7:21:56 AM, Chris Santerre wrote:
Thanks, I'll add his last 100 changes as well.
--Chris
-----Original Message----- From: Steven Champeon [mailto:schampeo@hesketh.com] Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 10:01 AM To: 'SURBL Discussion list' Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] free host: greatnow.com
Yep - confirmed. 'greatnow.com' is listed.
I really think we should discuss AND TEST adding new data sources before adding them to WS or any other list. There seem to be a lot of FPs in this blog list.
If we don't discuss and test these first, I may just remove them from WS.
Jeff C.
"If it appears in hams, then don't list it."