On Monday, September 20, 2004, 3:49:24 AM, Christer Borang wrote:
In message 414E1038.3A78@xyzzy.claranet.de, Frank Ellermann writes:
Jeff Chan wrote:
But me might also lean towards taking JP out of WS if we do this (i.e., no WS+JP).
That's what I wanted to say, treat both as independent sets:
WS = only WS (multi 127.0.0.4), JP = only JP (multi 127.0.0.64)
The last available multi bit / set / list is then 128 (bit 7).
Shouldn't it be possible to use the second and third field as well? For example, multi 127.0.1.0 for an eightth list? Of course, some code would need changes...
Yes, the additional 16 bits in the other two octets should be available for other lists, though I doubt we'll get that many. Presumably the programs would not need to change, only some additional list configs would be needed.
Jeff C.