Jeff Chan wrote to SURBL Discuss:
xiloo.com 1667 days 342 NANAS
Aside from those two, the rest may be candidates for whitelisting, though I did not check them further. (Note also that GetURI does not count NANAS; I did those few manually.
Hi Jeff,
The reason for that is twofold:
1. Obtaining that information automatically, although relatively easy and good for a fun time, expressly violates Google's ToS. They have a client library for automated queries, but it only allows 1000 queries per account per day, and doesn't yet work with Google Groups.
2. As we know, raw NANAS counts can be extremely misleading. For instance, as you pointed out a few days ago, yahoo.com has > 0.5M NANAS hits.
By forcing someone to click on the "[ NANAS ]" link, GetURI plays nicely with Google, and encourages people to hand-check NANAS hits to look for spamvertised examples. I'd worry that with raw counts automatically displayed, that some would draw false conclusions from "xx NANAS".
May I ask for some help in checking these?
Sure, I'll peek at a few right away.
- Ryan