13 Jul
2008
13 Jul
'08
7:20 p.m.
On Sunday, July 13, 2008, 10:02:04 AM, SM wrote:
If there are too many false positives, it's better to throw out the bad data at the risk of losing some good data. You can run a test feed to determine the effectiveness of each approach.
Which brings up a good point: does anyone have any current test data about the OB list that they can share, i.e., false positive rate especially compared to the other SURBL lists?
Cheers,
Jeff C.