1 Dec
2005
1 Dec
'05
11:18 a.m.
On Thursday, December 1, 2005, 1:58:39 AM, John Graham-Cumming wrote:
Jeff Chan wrote:
It would require rewriting SURBL applications and some work on the data side also. It would also require a way to signal that paths should be checked and at what level in the query (i.e., what subdomain level) the path information is encoded.
All true, but I think the SURBL data itself would be backwards compatible with users who don't implement the geocities code since they'd just check geocities.com against the SURBL and come up ok.
Yes, it probably would be backward compatible for most applications.
Jeff C. -- Don't harm innocent bystanders.