22 Apr
2004
22 Apr
'04
2:59 a.m.
On Wednesday, April 21, 2004, 5:38:06 PM, Simon Byrnand wrote:
At 12:30 22/04/2004, you wrote:
Just browsing through my spam folder and noticed a spam with the following URL:
[URL snipped]
(without the -munged of course)
Well that blew up in my face. My own SpamAssassin running SpamCopURI-0.12 (and the redirect parser enabled) picked that URL up despite my attempt to mung it, and matched it against both sc and ws :) Fortunately BAYES_00 was enough to prevent it from actually being blocked, but possibly some of you out there may have blocked it...
I can see one disadvantage to surbl - it makes it pretty hard to discuss the domain names of spammers ;)
LOL! Munge harder... ;-)
Jeff C.