On Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 11:24:16 AM, Andy Warner wrote:
Jeff,
In reference to:
I removed and whitelisted cafe24.com on my end. They seem to be a Korean free hoster that is being abused.
mynetmarketer.com hits several of my traps on a recurring basis and ignores all unsub requests. They have an abuse policy on their site and list terms and conditions, but they do not seem to enforce either. I plan to leave them listed as they seem dirty and I do not see any logical way they would end up in hams.
petsunlimited.com does not seem to be in my data and I do not recall removing it any time recently, so I'm not sure why it is showing up as an AB hit, but they should be whitelisted
careerslb.com seems to have valid uses, but they spam like crazy and do not honor removal requests. I guess they should be whitelisted on the SURBL end, but I plan to keep them in my data to track their volume.
Thanks for the research Andy! careerslb and petsunlimited clearly have potential legitimate uses so I'm whitelisting them. Neither is in SBL nor has any NANAS hits.
I've also whitelisted cafe24, but if we have anyone who can read Korean, I'd like to hear what they think the site is and whether it may have legitimate uses. Does anyone here have Korean-reading contacts? cafe24.com has about 1000 NANAS, is on SBL and has been registered since 1999. If they are a host or portal, they may have some significant abuse problems.
mynetmarketer.com is a lot less clear. Their NANAS hits look very spammy, yet they do have very strong sounding anti-spam policy.
http://www.mynetmarketer.com/spam.htm
They are not in SBL, have been registered since 2001, and have 212 NANAS hits. Does anyone know if they have any legitimate uses? I am not whitelisting them without more feedback.
Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."