On Thursday, July 1, 2004, 11:47:37 AM, Don Newcomer wrote:
Hat's off to the folks who brought out the new SURBL checks! Here's my top 15 rule hits over the past 20 hours and look where my 4 URIBLs come in:
18832 - HTML_MESSAGE (0.100) - 50_scores.cf 10296 - BAYES_99 (5.400) - 50_scores.cf 9810 - OB_URI_RBL (4.0) - surbl.cf 9403 - MIME_HTML_ONLY (0.320) - 50_scores.cf 8367 - WS_URI_RBL (3.0) - surbl.cf 7922 - CLICK_BELOW (0.100) - 50_scores.cf 5220 - HTML_LINK_CLICK_HERE (0.100) - 50_scores.cf 5102 - SPAMCOP_URI_RBL (3.0) - surbl.cf 4470 - MIME_MISSING_BOUNDARY (1.838) - 50_scores.cf 4401 - MY_SHRT_IMG (0.848) - coding_html.cf 4285 - MK_BAD_HTML_05 (0.3) - coding_html.cf 4118 - NO_REAL_NAME (0.160) - 50_scores.cf 4111 - AB_URI_RBL (5.0) - surbl.cf 3887 - SARE_FROM_SPAM_WORD3 (0.100) - 70_sare_header.cf 3678 - MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET (0.561) - 50_scores.cf
Thanks much for the data and the compliments Don! I'm forwarding your results to the SURBL discussion list.
It's interesting to see how well ob is detecting spams. My hat is off in thanks to the OutBlaze folks for providing the data.
Still looking for anyone's spam detection rates and false positive rates with all the lists:
sc.surbl.org - SpamCop spamvertised sites ws.surbl.org - sa-blacklist, BigEvil and other data ob.surbl.org - OutBlaze spamvertised sites ab.surbl.org - AbuseButler spamvertised sites
ds.surbl.org (beta, 6dos data)
Jeff C.