On Tuesday, September 7, 2004, 8:37:49 AM, Chris Santerre wrote:
From: Jeff Chan [mailto:jeffc@surbl.org]
On Saturday, September 4, 2004, 2:01:05 AM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
How about www.senderbase.org ?
I would not go that way, people can test on
senderbase/bonded sender, and
just like habaes this will be abused also. In my SA setup
the above scores
are also taken, and will bias the score...
Are any of them grey? Bonded sender claims they have paid out only tiny amounts of bonds due to violations.
Remember that not everyone uses SA. I'd like to have a list of non-spammers to exclude from SURBLs.
I have requested rsync access on the zones, they have
responded to that
and we will setup a feed, afterwards i can have a look on
the zones, and
check a little better. More indepth...
Sounds perfectly reasonable. We can check if any of their customers hit our lists.
Are there any other nominally whitehatting organizations we could check into? Are there any real whitehat certification groups?
Anyone who mentions DMA will be introduced to my hockey stick!
Just want to make sure we are all clear on that one ;)
-note- DMA = Direct Marketers Assoc. = the evil empire
OK, but are there any whitehat organizations we should consider looking at for "whitening" like Bonded Sender?
Jeff C.