On Sunday, September 26, 2004, 2:37:03 AM, Jeff Chan wrote:
Does anyone have opinions on whether mailbacks.com should be whitelisted? Currently it's in OB, but it has no NANAS or SBL hits.
Registrant: Vincent Associates INc (TOFGMBXNWD) 26 Lesmill Rd Toronto Ontario M3B 2T5 CA Domain Name: MAILBACKS.COM
[...]
Record expires on 12-Aug-2014. Record created on 12-Aug-2004.
While the domain registration for mailbacks.com is recent, the one for the parent company (same name servers) is quite old:
Domain Name: VINCENTINC.COM Registrar: NETWORK SOLUTIONS, LLC. Whois Server: whois.networksolutions.com Referral URL: http://www.networksolutions.com Name Server: NS0.BIZCONTINUITY.COM Name Server: NS2.BIZCONTINUITY.COM Name Server: NS0.VINCENTINC.COM Name Server: NS1.VINCENTINC.COM Status: ACTIVE Updated Date: 06-jul-2004 Creation Date: 10-may-1996 Expiration Date: 11-may-2012
The company looks legitimate. Unless there's some good evidence they're spamming from mailbacks.com, I'm inclined to whitelist. Anyone have any info or research?
Outblaze, what do your trapped messages look like?
Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."