3 Sep
2004
3 Sep
'04
3:14 a.m.
On Thursday, September 2, 2004, 9:15:54 AM, Steven Champeon wrote:
on Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 09:05:08AM -0700, Bret Miller wrote:
1)We DO NOT include it in multi.
Please reconsider this... Including it in multi means a lot less DNS traffic, and that's a serious plus when you're using a greylist that you probably won't use to increase the spam score by much.
No, no, no.
If anything, the unconfirmed list WILL contain FPs. It WILL certainly be a /superset/ of all the other lists. Including it in multi simply means corrupting multi for no real purpose, and is almost certainly going to mean that those least sophisticated users will get FPs as a result.
Agreed.
Jeff C.