30 Sep
2004
30 Sep
'04
11:18 p.m.
On Thursday, September 30, 2004, 7:33:35 AM, Steven Champeon wrote:
on Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 06:27:37PM -0700, Jeff Chan wrote:
Most of the professional spams I've seen lately seem to have only the spammer's own domain in them.
Really? Most of those I've seen lately have the spammers (obfuscated) domain and three bogus domains constructed out of the victim's localpart, e.g. http://schampeo.org, http://schampeo.net, http://schampeo.com - it's become so reliable a filter that I am toying around with skipping all SURBL checks on any such message.
Yeah I've seen some of those too. They didn't seem to be in the majority of my spams though.
Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."