On Friday, June 25, 2004, 12:16:17 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
My results, testing ph while I was at it:
: jm 1351...; grep -v " 0.500 " freqs OVERALL% SPAM% HAM% S/O RANK SCORE NAME 121405 22516 98889 0.185 0.00 0.00 (all messages) 100.000 18.5462 81.4538 0.185 0.00 0.00 (all messages as %) 13.453 70.3766 0.4925 0.993 1.00 1.00 SURBL_WS 3.807 20.3811 0.0334 0.998 0.50 1.00 SURBL_SC 2.650 14.2565 0.0071 1.000 0.50 1.00 SURBL_AB 0.019 0.0933 0.0020 0.979 0.50 1.00 SURBL_PH 12.624 67.6275 0.1001 0.999 0.50 1.00 SURBL_OB2 13.295 68.5113 0.7230 0.990 0.00 1.00 SURBL_OB
OB2 looks pretty promising ;)
Thanks much for the data. Yusuf from Outblaze said to use the ob2 data source, so I will switch ob over to it unless there are any results or comments to the contrary.
If anyone else is able to give some test results for ab, ob and ob2, please speak up.
The one PH fp is a link to this:
http://qrxx.4t.com/barbieOS.htm
(which no longer works, but 4t.com was a geocities-type hosting site as far as I know.)
I have whitelisted 4t.com in SURBLs.
David Hooton, You may want to check how 4t.com got into the phishing data.
Jeff C.