2 Dec
2004
2 Dec
'04
10:10 p.m.
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, Chris Santerre wrote:
I stripped the header for this discussion. Is this a spam domain or an attempt to poison SURBL. It is obviously a spam, but is domain bogus?
-----Original Message-----
*SNIP*
[snip..]
href=3D"http://hesatosser.com.info/?wid=3D100005%22%3EH= ERE</a><br><br>
[snip..]
<a href=3D"http://hesatosser.com.info/?wid=3D100005%22%3E Get it now
[snip..]
href=3D"http://http://hesatosser.com.com/nomore.html%22%3EGo here</a> to stop=
Neither, it's broken spam-ware. The actual pill-spam-site is "hesatosser .com" (which is listed in SURBL ;).
"*.com.com" is a valid domain name, belongs to CNet, clearly not spam. "*.com.info" isn't even a valid domain at all.
--
Dave Funk University of Iowa
<dbfunk (at) engineering.uiowa.edu> College of Engineering
319/335-5751 FAX: 319/384-0549 1256 Seamans Center
Sys_admin/Postmaster/cell_admin Iowa City, IA 52242-1527
#include <std_disclaimer.h>
Better is not better, 'standard' is better. B{