On Thursday, September 2, 2004, 8:25:40 AM, Chris Santerre wrote:
From: Jeff Chan [mailto:jeffc@surbl.org]
euniverse is not squeeky clean.
Never said they were. The question is do they have legitimate uses, and it sounds like the answer is yes.
Jeff C.
Did I ever send the RBL results for dietingplans.com?
Results: Positive=9, Negative=21 (2004-09-01 19:09:48 UTC)
* @SPAM/spamsource: 12.129.205/24: 553 SPAM,BULK ATT mail3051.flowgo.comspecial@intelligentx.com 2002-04; SBL http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL5535; SPEWS [1] euniverse/yourbigvote, see http://spews.org/ask.cgi?S1 * AHBL/dnsbl.ahbl.org: 12.129.205/24: 553 AHBL Spam Source; AHBL Open Proxy [Details] * AUDNSBL/dnsbl.net.au: 12.129.205/24: 553 AUDNSBL Multiple Spam Traps Block List [Remove] * DRBL/drbl.all: 12.129.205/24: 553 DRBL weight: 1.4; vote.drbl.sandy.ru@ns.sci-nnov.ru/0.6 vote.drbl.vsu.ru@ns.vsu.ru/0.8; flowgo.com; flowgo.com spam engine. 20020218. Blocked by blacklist-admin@vsu.ru * SBL/spamhaus.org: 12.129.205/24: 553 SBL http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL5535 * SPEWS/spews.org: 12.129.205/24: 553 SPEWS2 [1] euniverse/yourbigvote, see http://spews.org/ask.cgi?S1677 * BLARS/block.blars.org: INET 127.3.8.32 * INTERSIL/flowgo.bulk: Flowgo/Euniverse/media synergy/etc.; http://www.cauce.org/incidents/flonetwork.com/index.shtml; 2001May01; dig TXT netlist.flowgoaway.com for CIDR list * FIVETEN/flonetwork.com.bulk: UNKNOWN TXT (permfail,nodata)
I mean, to me this is a no brainer to list. :)
--Chris (I'm annoying sometimes!)
To me the question is: does it have legitimate uses? Does anyone actually sign up for their, uh, stuff? In the case of other Euniverse junk, the answer seems yes.
Jeff C.