Ryan Thompson wrote:
Alex Broens wrote to SURBL Discussion list:
Ryan Thompson wrote:
Ryan Thompson wrote to Jeff Chan and SURBL Discussion list:
Thanks for the feedback, Jeff!
Hey everybody,
Does this look better? http://ry.ca/geturi/results.html
There are many improvements to the output. Even *I'm* impressed.
It's getting close to feature freeze/release time again, methinks, to put these improvements into a stable release. So, if anyone has anything they'd like to see right away, please speak now. :-)
Great!
Thanks!
Why not add Spamhaus' XBL zone lookups?
The thought had only briefly crossed my mind. Is XBL really a good resource for SURBL classification? I thought XBL just listed exploited systems and open HTTP proxies. Hmm. I suppose I could just code it up and run it on a bunch of mail to see what happens... Or I could just use the combined sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org list, I suppose.
If a spammy looking msg comes thru an exploited system IMO it would qualify even more to be a SURBL inclusion as a genuine "marketer" would not be expected to use exploited machines, right? (silently waiting for Jeff to bark at me :-)
Keeping the lookups separate would give us a bit more detail to evaluate.
Alex