On Wednesday, July 14, 2004, 10:21:36 AM, William Stearns wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
meredith.com (magazine publisher - owner of americanbaby.com newsletter) websponsors.com be3a.com
I'll let you and Raymond come to a consensus on websponsors.com.websponsors is in the whitelist currently, just added it there, BUT! if i get more spam to my 3 spamtraps the comming days it will be moved out again. Is that acceptable?
That seems fine to me. David?
Per an earlier message, I've whitelisted meredith.com in SURBLs, and I added their americanbaby.com to the whitelisting also.
I'm whitelisting websponsors.com which was on be, ws and ds and probably remains in those source lists. If they have some legitimate use, but are abused by people who spam mentioning their site, they should probably be whitelisted. I'm interested in hearing if they are an actual sponsor or promoter of spamming however.
be3a.com I can't determine enough. They are on ws.
Jeff C.