People,
After watching this thread, I am beginning to see that there are 2 different interpretations of what SURBL's are here for.
1. Purist's view - SURBL's are here to block domains that only appear in spam 2. Spam Nazi - if it's spam block it at all costs
Neither is really right or wrong, but I am beginning to come around to Jeff's view that a list which has no clear rules of engagement is fraught with all kinds of difficulties and risks.
Getting back to the initial domains which sparked the controversy - flowgo, I think that perhaps there is room for a "MainSleaze" list which lists "Junk Mail" line flowgo etc, however one which is just for domains which we're not sure about is definately running like a lemming to a cliff.
Perhaps if we all slow down a bit and drew up some slightly stronger and less "grey" rules of engagement we might get the list up, but for now I agree with Jeff and being that he's our fearless leader we're going to need to try and find a compromise which will be more workable and structured than the currently possible domain dumping ground concept.