23 Apr
2005
23 Apr
'05
10:07 a.m.
On Wednesday, April 20, 2005, 10:10:48 AM, Frank Ellermann wrote:
Jeff Chan wrote:
SURBLs as they are currently defined are proving quite useful for many folks.
Sure. But a red.surbl.org "this is an open redirector" could be also useful.
It doesn't really fit our model, which is to list blackhats, especially zombie users.
Yesterday I actually missed a white.surbl.org when I didn't see 18.to in MULTI
If you have whitelisted 18.to please don't, I got more than three nina.18.to in the last weeks.
It is possible to blacklist nina.18.to but not 18.to if nina is owned by spammers but 18 is not.
Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."