If they are mostly spammy end user sites, they should be ok to list. If they are redirection sites they should probably not be listed, but contacted about the abuse.
Jeff C. __
On Thursday, August 26, 2004, 2:34:51 PM, Alex Broens wrote:
iZap.to iServe.to getIn.to Face.to dance.to clickin.to
(all blacklisted in my local SURBL Zone)
Alex
----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Santerre" csanterre@merchantsoverseas.com To: "'SURBL Discussion list'" discuss@lists.surbl.org Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 11:20 PM Subject: RE: [SURBL-Discuss] another new TLD?
getin.to file.to surf.to
all reported spams the past few days.
-----Original Message----- From: Steven Champeon [mailto:schampeo@hesketh.com] Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 4:47 PM To: SURBL Discussion list (E-mail) Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] another new TLD?
on Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 04:39:21PM -0400, Chris Santerre wrote:
File.to
from http://File.to/ooo
OK to add as well? Looks like spammers are trying to get
around the standard
com, net, info , biz.
Not new at all. That's Togo, who sold rights to their NIC and which TLD we often saw in redirection services (e.g., 'http://surf.to') back in the mid-nineties.
Didn't someone post a complete list of TLDs here just recently?
Jeff C.