Joe Wein wrote:
"Jeff Chan" jeffc@surbl.org
But that's not the question. The question is: does the domain have legitimate uses. If so we shouldn't list it. We should not list domains that have legitimate uses, even if they do send in some spam.
Hi Jeff,
the latest emails from Mr. Schiffer were much more friendly in tone. He also admitted that he was only bluffing when he talked about legal action, as he really does not have any money for that.
I have removed his listing and let him know about that. I hope he learnt something from it.
I probably wouldn't have removed the domain without your reminder. Looking at this case I realise how difficult it really is for submitters *not* to list spammers who may have some legitimate uses.
Joe
This is the sort of people I deal with all night at work. Those who "CLAIM" to be loosing a hundreds/thousands a day... of course they're running off a residential DSL connection which is in violation of our companies AUP. Course if they are really losing this amount per day I sell them a T1 8*))
But most of them back down when you point out they hav no leg to stand on.
-Doc (Who needs to get to said job soon)