Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
Its smaller, catches more then the combined list, and has a lower FP rating then the combined list.
Sounds very good. Technically only the lower FP rate is a convincing argument for an independent MULTI bit / set, and there are only 7 MULTI bits / sets.
If some users would want to use JP but not WS, then they'd need a separate bit. Somebody said that the lists overlap, therefore enumerations (0 null, 1 WS, 2 PJ, 3 third list) won't work to identify the source, and it has to be 0 null, 1 WS, 2 PJ, 3 WS+PJ (shifted to 2 corresponding MULTI bits).
Bye, Frank