Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
Hi!
I would recommend forwarding them to abuse@yahoo.com with an explanation of where they came from, etc. Yahoo does read their abuse mail.
That's a waste of time. They only remove the sites after at least 72H (if at all), well after their 'useful' life. Their spam support service really rocks !
Not really true. They use it also to track down ips and other info. They are not fast but i know whey are onto this.
What is not really true ?
They've been 'onto this', tracking down ips and other infos for more than a year !
See the result for yourself.
Hint ... all the IPs are on their own servers and the main relevant 'info' they can collect is unhappy recipients / honeypot email addresses for listwashing ...
AOL did it, Tripod did it, and spammers moved away. It's not a technical problem, it's a 'pink contract' problem.
The size of Geocities differs a little and makes it harder for them to search and destroy... Dont say its right, but i do understand.
Geocities is bigger, so they could easily have proportionnally bigger ressources if there was a will.
They don't need to scan everything at all times.only recently changed index pages. Since they process all pages (to insert the ads) I simply can't believe they don't have some form of blacklisting system integrated. Whenever a page changes, they can run the test once.
When there's a will there's a way.
Sorry, but they have *no* excuse.
Eric
Bye, Raymond. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.surbl.org http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss