This is a different data set.
4/20/05 midnight to midnight CDT total e-mails: 6477 total strikes: 1513 (23.4% of total e-mail) spam strikes: 1513 ham strikes: 0
total messages marked as spam (all rules): 4210 (65% of total e-mail) total messages marked as spam (all rules) also marked by XS: 1478
also in: URIBL_AB_SURBL: 447 (29.5% of XS hits) URIBL_OB_SURBL: 1120 (74% of XS hits) URIBL_PH_SURBL: 0 URIBL_SC_SURBL: 1160 (76.7% of XS hits) URIBL_WS_SURBL: 1124 (74.3% of XS hits) URIBL_JP_SURBL: 1416 (93.6% of XS hits)
NOT in any of the above: 61 (.041% of XS hits)
Hey if it proves to be fairly FP proof that's 61 less emails I have to deliver per day after I raise the score a bit)
-----Original Message----- From: discuss-bounces@lists.surbl.org [mailto:discuss-bounces@lists.surbl.org] On Behalf Of Raymond Dijkxhoorn Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 2:23 PM To: SURBL Discussion list Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] xs.surbl.org preliminary results
Hi!
total strikes: 204 spam strikes: 204 ham strikes: 0
total messages marked as spam (all rules): 1495 total messages marked as spam (all rules) also marked by XS: 204
Would be interesting to check if those would have been picked up by (for
example) JP, eg other SURBL lists. If its duplicates all over then it wont help much. I did a compare on the zonefiles but not that much fresh ones
inside. So far....
Bye, Raymond. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.surbl.org http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
This email contains privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the person to whom it is directed and intended. Any reproduction, dissemination or other use of this email by anyone who is not the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, you should advise the sender immediately and delete the email from your mail box.