3 Dec
2004
3 Dec
'04
2:58 a.m.
On Thursday, December 2, 2004, 6:25:48 PM, David Skoll wrote:
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, Jeff Chan wrote:
As long as they use a domain name in their spam URIs, which seems likely even with distributed (stolen) web service, we've got them covered with SURBLs.
Well, I assume they'd use IP addresses, not domain names. It would be exceedingly hard to use a domain name to point to one of several hundred zombies.
They could engineer some kind of dynamic DNS to go along with it.
IP addresses might be problematic for them to use since their hard coded IP address servers could go away at any time, rendering the particular spam mentioning any fixed address useless.
Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."