-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Jeff Chan writes:
We've added the content from ab and ob into multi.surbl.org, so it now has all the currently active lists:
http://www.surbl.org/lists.html
with the following bitmasks representing the different lists:
2 = comes from sc.surbl.org 4 = comes from ws.surbl.org (and be.surbl.org) 8 = comes from phishing list (labelled as ph in multi) 16 = comes from ob.surbl.org 32 = comes from ab.surbl.org
BTW, is this planned to be a bitmask, or multiple A records? because currently it seems to include only one BL per listed domain:
$ dig surbl-org-permanent-test-[blah].com.multi.surbl.org. ; <<>> DiG 9.2.4rc2 <<>> surbl-org-permanent-test-[blah].com.multi.surbl.org. ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 65530 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 13, ADDITIONAL: 11
;; QUESTION SECTION: ;surbl-org-permanent-test-[blah].com.multi.surbl.org. IN A
;; ANSWER SECTION: surbl-org-permanent-test-[blah].com.multi.surbl.org. 348906 IN A 127.0.0.2
;; AUTHORITY SECTION: surbl.org. 7212 IN NS ns5.surbl.org. [........etc.] ;; Query time: 27 msec ;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1) ;; WHEN: Sat Jun 26 20:30:04 2004 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 499
However, that domain, with "[blah]" replaced by "point" of course, is present in all the lists -- so it should be returning something either other than 127.0.0.2, or multiple records.
I've also updated the SURBL Quick Start page: http://www.surbl.org/quickstart.html to link to the updated URIDNSBL.pm page containing the urirhssub program which can use multi.surbl.org: http://spamassassin.org/full/3.0.x/dist/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/URIDNSB... and also added sample configs for using multi.surbl.org based on the sample URIBL configs at: http://www.spamassassin.org/full/3.0.x/dist/rules/25_uribl.cf Would someone who has actually used urirhssub please check the sample configs and scores for correctness?
yep, looks fine. could you open a bug on the sa bugzilla and I'll get those in before we start mass-checking? (hopefully, assuming everyone's happy with the accuracy rates. OB_SURBL for sure at least, though.)
Updating the documentation like this is in preparation for the release of SA 3.0. Does anyone have any thoughts on when we should announce the multi.surbl.org support? Should it wait until 3.0 is fully released or not?
Nah. go ahead and announce! other products will want to use it, no need for them to wait for SpamAssassin. ;)
- --j.