Thanks for your feedback David. Does anyone else have comments about the possibility of PJ? Making separate lists from the WS data is a little different from the direction we've been going lately, so it would be nice to get comments on it. We're still somewhat undecided about whether to do it or not....
As you can see from the first message about this, the FP rates of PJ look significantly lower than WS as a whole.
I'm for splitting the data out of WS into it's own list and including it in multi. Certainly, having a lower FP rate will encourage users to increase its weight in scoring messages.
Bret