On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, Jeff Chan wrote:
OK Looks like someone (lol I'm nominated, I guess) needs to put his foot down and set a new name for sa.surbl.org, our RBL version of Bill Stearns' sa-blacklist SA ruleset.
Is this DNSBL different from other RHSBLs? If not why reinvent the wheel? rhsbl.surbl.org sounds good to me, though unless use is to be somehow restricted to just sa there should be a distinction between sender domains (user@example.com) and host domains (mx1.example.com). For that I use sender.rhsbl...com and client.rhsbl...com, saving ip.rbl...com for the RBL.