On Friday, April 30, 2004, 6:55:44 PM, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
For what it's worth, most of the URLs hitting SURBL in my ham are spam URLs anyway.
On Saturday, 140 messages hit BE or WS SURBL out of 14971 total ham in my corpus.
Retesting those 140 messages now, only 105 messages hit, so you've probably removed some domains since Friday. Hopefully, because they're not spamming domains.
To be honest, be and ws are maintained by Bill, Chris and crew. My main contribution, other than rblifying them, is to check them against our manual whitelist before they get turned into SURBLs. So if there are significant changes, it's probably due to changes those authors made.
I can somewhat take a step back from sc.surbl.org also in that the source data for it comes from SpamCop reports, with some munging, whitelisting, etc. done by my engine.
Jeff C.