On Saturday 29 May 2004 21:17, Jeff Chan wrote:
Now I'm confused as to which machine you refer... ;-)
The system that has never shown a SPAMCOP_URI_RBL does have that line, the one at work just shows spamcop occasionally, per this score: score RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET 1.1
Aha, eemember that bl.spamcop.net and sc.surbl.org are not the same thing. :-) The former is SpamCop's RBL of mail source addresses (sending IPs, etc.), whereas sc.surbl.org is derived from Spamvertised sites reported in message bodies. The two are not related other than using SpamCop reports for source data. bl uses header info while sc.surbl.org uses message body URI info.
The score you mention is for the bl, and not a SURBL.
Jeff C.
Well, scratch that machine (the work one). That's the machine without surbl installed anyway.
The home one does have surbl, and I just scanned 120 spams to see if it flagged any of them, (nope). I'm going to reduce the score from 3.0 to .5 just on the chance SURBL is working and pushing all the spam over my /dev/nul limit in my procmail.
But so far still no hint that it work. Checked DNS (ok and ok with lint too) Restarted spamd Checked to make sure I moved the modules as explained under painfull install.
This is perl, v5.8.0 built for i586-linux-thread-multi. on Suse 8.2 smp.