Eric Montréal a écrit :
[snip] But if they did not use the list, that's even better ! It means they can, whenever they see fit, remove more than 95% of all their spammy sites. Poof ! gone ...
If they can do that, then why don't they *always* do it ?
I guess it's easier for them to determine that a site is bad because it is listed (on a list they trust) than to check that themselves. If so, this is a lazy approach.
The least they could do is to setup spam traps to watch for mail containing their URLs. if the traps are sufficiently protected (secret/can'tbe guessed), they can even have an automated process.