-----Original Message----- From: discuss-bounces@lists.surbl.org [mailto:discuss- bounces@lists.surbl.org] On Behalf Of John Wilcock Sent: Thursday, 13 May 2004 4:06 PM To: Jeff Chan; SURBL Discussion list Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss]
On Wed, 12 May 2004 16:02:33 -0700, Jeff Chan wrote:
- Another question would be the name of the combined list. Since
there would be three or more lists, someone had suggested a name of "all" before. That sounds good to me unless there are other suggestions.
This could potentially lead to confusion if you subsequently add another list not included in the "all" for some reason. That may seem unlikely now, but who knows? How about "multi"?
How about surbl.surbl.org? Being the primary rbl, this kinda makes sense :)
Also on the other points about how to respond - I suggest the different IP per list as being smartest the octet based response is too non-specific. This only leaves the question on how do we handle multiple listings :)
Cheers!!
Dave
======================================================================== Pain free spam & virus protection by: www.mailsecurity.net.au Forward undetected SPAM to: spam@mailsecurity.net.au ========================================================================