on Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 01:02:12PM -0300, Mariano Absatz wrote:
We can include in multi, why not...
Nope... One of the ideas behind multi is that lazy sysadmins can put only one rule and if that hit, then 'subrl hit'.
I think this MUST NOT be in multi.
[X] STRONGLY AGREE
I concord with Steven's comment... this MUST NOT be called 'greylist' because that term is already beeing used for something completely different... I'd like a name that implies that it WILL have FPs... it can be the elegant 'unconfirmed.surbl.org' as Seteven suggested or something on the line of 'this-has-false-positives.surbl.org' or 'dont-use-this-if-you-re-stupid.surbl.org' :-)
Heh. That last is a certain guarantee that it will be used by the most idiotic of mail admins, though ;) Maybe something like
only-a-complete-moron-would-use-this.surbl.org
would be safer, as morons don't tend to think of themselves that way :)
'unconfirmed' is simple, though, and has some precedents in DNSBL usage. It's more a "quarantine on this if you like, but don't blame us as the list hasn't even been looked at yet and is probably the result of an automatic but error-prone process" kind of thing, like unconfirmed.dsbl.org.