Hello,
The following domains are listed at WS, there were sightings in NANAS, some says poetry . com is a total scam :-)
cellular-parts . com Created on: 30-Jul-98 poetry . com Created on 15-Oct-1996
We have customers who are actively subscribed to their lists. But just wanted to get everyones opinion whether these 2 should be whitelisted.
Thanks, -b.
On Saturday, October 2, 2004, 2:48:44 AM, Bitz Bitz wrote:
Hello,
The following domains are listed at WS, there were sightings in NANAS, some says poetry . com is a total scam :-)
cellular-parts . com Created on: 30-Jul-98 poetry . com Created on 15-Oct-1996
We have customers who are actively subscribed to their lists. But just wanted to get everyones opinion whether these 2 should be whitelisted.
No SBL hits on either of these relatively old domains. No NANAS hits on cellular-parts, 68 on poetry.
Please send one sample of each message.
Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."
Jeff Chan wrote to Bitz:
On Saturday, October 2, 2004, 2:48:44 AM, Bitz Bitz wrote:
Hello,
The following domains are listed at WS, there were sightings in NANAS, some says poetry . com is a total scam :-)
cellular-parts . com Created on: 30-Jul-98 poetry . com Created on 15-Oct-1996
We have customers who are actively subscribed to their lists. But just wanted to get everyones opinion whether these 2 should be whitelisted.
No SBL hits on either of these relatively old domains. No NANAS hits on cellular-parts, 68 on poetry.
Please send one sample of each message.
I can vouch for poetry.com. I haven't had any mailings from them, but they are a legit site, and should probably be whitelisted. The NANAS reports also appear to be bogus; some contain the bare domain "poetry.com" in tiny font, and some link to images (e.g., of Robert Frost) on poetry.com, but, after looking at all the reports from this year, none actually advertise poetry.com.
cellular-parts.com, I know nothing about, except that it's been around for more than five years and looks pretty darned legit to me.
- Ryan
Ryan Thompson wrote to SURBL Discussion list:
No SBL hits on either of these relatively old domains. No NANAS hits on cellular-parts, 68 on poetry.
Please send one sample of each message.
I can vouch for poetry.com. I haven't had any mailings from them, but they are a legit site, and should probably be whitelisted. The NANAS reports also appear to be bogus; some contain the bare domain "poetry.com" in tiny font, and some link to images (e.g., of Robert Frost) on poetry.com, but, after looking at all the reports from this year, none actually advertise poetry.com.
In fact following another quick sanity check, I'll do more than vouch for them. I've whitelisted poetry.com (on WS). They should never be blocked in the first place.
- Ryan
On Saturday, October 2, 2004, 12:01:14 PM, Ryan Thompson wrote:
Ryan Thompson wrote to SURBL Discussion list:
No SBL hits on either of these relatively old domains. No NANAS hits on cellular-parts, 68 on poetry.
Please send one sample of each message.
I can vouch for poetry.com. I haven't had any mailings from them, but they are a legit site, and should probably be whitelisted. The NANAS reports also appear to be bogus; some contain the bare domain "poetry.com" in tiny font, and some link to images (e.g., of Robert Frost) on poetry.com, but, after looking at all the reports from this year, none actually advertise poetry.com.
In fact following another quick sanity check, I'll do more than vouch for them. I've whitelisted poetry.com (on WS). They should never be blocked in the first place.
- Ryan
Thanks. Agreed.
Looks like the NANAS hits include image links for spams going to third party web sites. Those mainly appeared in contest spams, so perhaps poetry.com was doing some kind of incentivized contest that got abused. In any case their domain does appear to have legitimate uses, so it should be whitelisted.
Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."
On Saturday, October 2, 2004, 11:44:39 AM, Ryan Thompson wrote:
Jeff Chan wrote to Bitz:
On Saturday, October 2, 2004, 2:48:44 AM, Bitz Bitz wrote:
Hello,
The following domains are listed at WS, there were sightings in NANAS, some says poetry . com is a total scam :-)
cellular-parts . com Created on: 30-Jul-98 poetry . com Created on 15-Oct-1996
We have customers who are actively subscribed to their lists. But just wanted to get everyones opinion whether these 2 should be whitelisted.
No SBL hits on either of these relatively old domains. No NANAS hits on cellular-parts, 68 on poetry.
Please send one sample of each message.
[...]
cellular-parts.com, I know nothing about, except that it's been around for more than five years and looks pretty darned legit to me.
Yes, cellular-parts.com looks very legitimate to me.
Bill, Can you tell us why you added it?
black-wstearns-hand-checked:cellular-parts.com
Since they appear to have legitimate uses, I'm whitelisting them.
Bitz, Please still forward copies of the subscribed messages to me.
Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."