The imagerocket.com domain is listed in WS and appears in a message received today from bizrate.com. I use bizrate myself (though this message wasn't to me), so I know they aren't hard-core spammers. The message source is attached.
I'm not familiar with imagerocket.com, so can't say whether they'd be a good spam indicator if the message wasn't from bizrate.com.
Bret
----------
Send your spam to: bretmiller@wcg.org Thanks for keeping the internet spam-free!
Bret Miller wrote to SURBL Discussion list:
The imagerocket.com domain is listed in WS and appears in a message received today from bizrate.com. I use bizrate myself (though this message wasn't to me), so I know they aren't hard-core spammers. The message source is attached.
I'm not familiar with imagerocket.com, so can't say whether they'd be a good spam indicator if the message wasn't from bizrate.com.
I've encountered imagerocket before, and, IIRC, they're an image host... so they'd be commonly used by spammers (and hammers) for image hosting.
Heh. "Hammers".
- Ryan
On Thursday, September 9, 2004, 2:06:50 PM, Ryan Thompson wrote:
Bret Miller wrote to SURBL Discussion list:
The imagerocket.com domain is listed in WS and appears in a message received today from bizrate.com. I use bizrate myself (though this message wasn't to me), so I know they aren't hard-core spammers. The message source is attached.
I'm not familiar with imagerocket.com, so can't say whether they'd be a good spam indicator if the message wasn't from bizrate.com.
I've encountered imagerocket before, and, IIRC, they're an image host... so they'd be commonly used by spammers (and hammers) for image hosting.
Heh. "Hammers".
- Ryan
Whitelisting imagerocket.com unless there are major objections...
If they're commonly used in ham, we don't want to list.
Jeff C.