-----Original Message----- From: David Hooton [mailto:david.hooton@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 9:23 AM To: Jeff Chan; SURBL Discussion list Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Fwd: quickinspirations.com

On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:54:22 -0700, Jeff Chan jeffc@surbl.org wrote:

...

This was the original report send to the whitelist@surbl.org address. Note that it included no examples, no explanation, no reasons, etc.

That's why it's nice include some of those, eh?

Jeff C. __

This is a forwarded message From: Bitz bitoy@lawin.pinoy.org To: whitelist@surbl.org Date: Friday, July 30, 2004, 5:17:43 PM Subject: quickinspirations.com

===8<==============Original message text=============== quickinspirations.com

===8<===========End of original message text===========

Perhaps people who request domains to be delisted but provide no evidence should just be permanently lists? :p

LOL. Should we at least rethink this kind of domain? Some people are going to scream "Legit!" because they don't know they were fooled.

I'm not asking for this domain to be changed right now. I'm asking more for people to start thinking about these kind of legit looking signup spams. Keep the seed in the back of your mind, as we may see more of this.

--Chris