This morning we received a huge blast from a spammer that spamhaus.org identified properly but multi.surbl.org.rbldnsd didn't :( Just checking though :)
Eric -----Original Message----- From: discuss-bounces@lists.surbl.org [mailto:discuss-bounces@lists.surbl.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Chan Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 8:03 PM To: discuss@lists.surbl.org Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] SURBL Content
On Friday, May 6, 2005, 10:57:25 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
Quick question regarding multi.surbl.org.rbldnsd; the list of content for this file (i.e. sc.surbl.org, ws.surbl.org, etc) on the surbl.org website
is
all inclusive correct?
Yes.
Does multi.surbl.org.rbldnsd contain anything from spamhaus.org or any other content providers?
Not yet, though we're working on some trapped URI data from the CBL folks.
Why do you ask? :-)
Thanks, Eric Smith
Cheers,
Jeff C. -- Don't harm innocent bystanders.
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.surbl.org http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
On Friday, May 6, 2005, 5:59:15 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
This morning we received a huge blast from a spammer that spamhaus.org identified properly but multi.surbl.org.rbldnsd didn't :( Just checking though :)
Eric
When you say spamhaus.org, which list are you referring to, XBL or SBL? Because one of the new lists we're experimenting with, xu.surbl.org, gets data from CBL spamtrap URI hits. CBL feeds into XBL, and some of the XBL senders probably end up in SBL also.
Next time you see one like this, if you check it using the SURBL checker:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/cgi-bin/uribl.cgi
it would be interesting to to hear if it hits the preliminary version of the XS data.
Cheers,
Jeff C. -- Don't harm innocent bystanders.
-
Jeff Chan -
Smith, Eric