-----Original Message----- From: David Coulson [mailto:david@davidcoulson.net] Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 9:38 AM To: SURBL Discussion list Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] And away we go!
SpamCopURI stats for one domain here for this morning.
Total: 33024 SC 22090 WS 19029 BE 3597
On a similar note, Spamhaus' XBL got hit 23847 times which is pretty impressive.
David
And BE will ALWAYS be lower...Why? I use RBLs at the MTA level :)
I knew it would effect my file, but I couldn't let the company take a hit for BigEvil sake.
--Chris
Chris Santerre wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: David Coulson [mailto:david@davidcoulson.net] Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 9:38 AM To: SURBL Discussion list Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] And away we go!
SpamCopURI stats for one domain here for this morning.
Total: 33024 SC 22090 WS 19029 BE 3597
On a similar note, Spamhaus' XBL got hit 23847 times which is pretty impressive.
David
And BE will ALWAYS be lower...Why? I use RBLs at the MTA level :)
I knew it would effect my file, but I couldn't let the company take a hit for BigEvil sake.
I left bigevil.cf in my spamassassin directory and added the RBL for be.surbl.org and both are catching things!!
Maybe a suggestion. Might want to make a limited bigevil which just does the variable domains. And then folks can use it along with the RBL be. Did that make sense?
Damn I either need a new unix sleep command or more coffee! 8*))
I'll run some stats from my test here in a bit and we shall see what is what.
Chris as always you are a "big nerd" HAR!
-Doc (Who has been a nerd for almost half a century!)
-
Chris Santerre -
Doc Schneider