-----Original Message----- From: Jeff Chan [mailto:jeffc@surbl.org] Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 2:18 PM To: Chris Santerre Cc: 'Jeff Chan'; SURBL Discussion list (E-mail) Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] free host: greatnow.com
On Friday, October 22, 2004, 11:00:56 AM, Chris Santerre wrote:
I thought we had a discussion on this already? The list I
added has been in
there for like 2 months. I went thru it. I do NOT use this
guys list nilly
willy. I haven't updated that file in 2 months. I only took
his 100 recent
changes, and went thru it and pulled a bunch out that were
in question.
This was the most recent discussion I could find. It doesn't seem to mention actually using the jayallen data in WS, though I might have missed a message:
Fine. Removed. A known blog spammer host gets one FP and we remove then all. Done.
--Chris
-----Original Message----- From: Jeff Chan [mailto:jeffc@surbl.org] Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 2:18 PM To: Chris Santerre Cc: 'Jeff Chan'; SURBL Discussion list (E-mail) Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] free host: greatnow.com
On Friday, October 22, 2004, 11:00:56 AM, Chris Santerre wrote:
I thought we had a discussion on this already? The list I
added has been in
there for like 2 months. I went thru it. I do NOT use this
guys list nilly
willy. I haven't updated that file in 2 months. I only took
his 100 recent
changes, and went thru it and pulled a bunch out that were
in question.
This was the most recent discussion I could find. It doesn't seem to mention actually using the jayallen data in WS, though I might have missed a message:
Fine. Removed. A known blog spammer host gets one FP and we remove then all. Done.
--Chris
There's a difference between removing the entire list and checking them carefully before using them.
We can use the data if we check it first.
Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."
On Friday, October 22, 2004, 11:27:25 AM, Jeff Chan wrote:
There's a difference between removing the entire list and checking them carefully before using them.
We can use the data if we check it first.
Can you post or link the list so we can all see the data and comment on it?
Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."
On Friday, October 22, 2004, 11:28:13 AM, Chris Santerre wrote:
From: Jeff Chan [mailto:jeffc@surbl.org]
This was the most recent discussion I could find. It doesn't seem to mention actually using the jayallen data in WS, though I might have missed a message:
Fine. Removed. A known blog spammer host gets one FP and we remove then all. Done.
Chris, Instead of withdrawing the list can you give us a chance to review it?
Jeff C.
On Friday, October 22, 2004, 3:57:47 PM, Jeff Chan wrote:
On Friday, October 22, 2004, 11:28:13 AM, Chris Santerre wrote:
From: Jeff Chan [mailto:jeffc@surbl.org]
This was the most recent discussion I could find. It doesn't seem to mention actually using the jayallen data in WS, though I might have missed a message:
Fine. Removed. A known blog spammer host gets one FP and we remove then all. Done.
Chris, Instead of withdrawing the list can you give us a chance to review it?
Chris, If you put the file back up with a non-used name, I can turn it into a test SURBL for people to try. After testing and debugging we could look at adding it to a list. The broader the testing, the better the results.
I usually put up new lists for people to test as widely as possible before turning them live.
Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."
-
Chris Santerre -
Jeff Chan